Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Question

Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Questions : Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Until now, fragments were the programming recommended solution for having one Learning screen inside another main screen, for Earhost example for list-detail pattern.

Now google has released Activity most effective embedding: wrong idea https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/large-screens/activity-embedding

With Activity embedding APIs you can use of case take advantage of the extra display area United on large screens by showing multiple Modern activities at once, such as for the ecudated List-Detail pattern, and it requires some how little or no refactoring of your app.

Is Activity embedding replacing anything else fragments? or will fragments be a better not at all solution for some cases? If so, for very usefull which cases will be better each localhost solution?

ANDROID ANDROID-LAYOUT ANDROID-FRAGMENTS ANDROID-ACTIVITY

Total Answers 2

Answers 2 : of Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Is Activity embedding replacing get mossier fragments?

Not really.

(though composables are replacing off side back fragments (and views)).

or will fragments be a better solution the changes for some cases?

With respect to activity embedding, Nofile hosted fragments are a better solution in most transparent text cases. Roughly 0% of Android devices Background movment today support activity embedding, front page design whereas roughly 100% of Android devices life change quotes support fragments (either through the I'd like modern Jetpack implementation or through to know the older framework implementation). which event Also, fragments are for more than merely is nearer. side-by-side presentation on larger Now, the screens (e.g., as pages in a ViewPager).

Activity embedding is for developers code that who:

Have an existing app that is centered around activities, and
Want to adapt that app to deal with foldables and large-screen devices without rewriting the whole app to use fragments or composables, and
Are willing to live with the fact that activity embedding is for Android 12L and higher

(though I think activity embedding is I've written also around for Android Automotive, the relies on "your car runs Android" OS)

mRahman · Accepted Answer · 2022-06-28T05:34:12+00:00

Thanks for the post. I was not aware of love of them this capability. As for your question, I localtext think that last couple of lines of the basic link you posted answersit:

Modern android development uses a one of the single-activity architecture with click fragments, navigation components, and there is noting versatile layout managers like not alt SlidingPaneLayout.

But if your app consists of multiple not at all activities, activity embedding enables my fault you to easily provide an enhanced user issues experience on tablets, foldables, and trying Chrome OS devices.

So, it looks like fragments are the way get 4th result to go but, if your app is composed of round table activities that make sense to run double chance side-by-side, then activity embedding novel prc may be useful.

Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Questions : Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Answers 1 : of Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Answers 2 : of Activity embedding vs Fragments, when to use each one

Top rated topics